A LITTLE NUANCE: Essay by William Corbett
When Catherine Kehoe paints, she is stared
at by a row of self-portraits. The face is stern, dour, severe, less a witness
than a juror or judge. She wears red-framed eyeglasses, and her focus is so
intense that she must be seeing what we cannot see. These are images of
concentrated attention. You want to snap your fingers in front of her face to
break the spell. Kehoe has said that her voice “within is loud and clear; it
banishes all others from the studio.” These small but fierce self-portraits may
be that voice in paint.
Kehoe’s bare-bones studio is half the
unheated attic of the Roslindale house she shares with her partner, the painter
Nancy McCarthy. Three skylights admit north light; a small space heater gives
warmth and lamps provide light for night-work. Her materials are what Kehoe
requires and no more—two or three metal straight edges, a palette knife,
several squared off, tapered sable bright brushes (she throws them away when
they lose their edge) and a palette with colors ranged around its edges. Kehoe
likes a full palette of Winsor & Newton and Williamsburg oil paints from
which she mixes and derives the intense colors she currently favors. Scattered
about are the toys, plates and pieces of cloth Kehoe uses as set-ups for her
still lifes.
The action is at the easel in the
center of the room. Before it Kehoe sits to paint a still life referring to the
set-up she has positioned like a stage set in an open cardboard box. She is
about fourteen inches from the panel or canvas on which she paints. Kehoe likes
control—this space feels like a cockpit—wants no distractions (music is
fine—Frank Sinatra, the Andrews Sisters, Lee Wiley and Leonard Cohen are on her
iPod) and when things change before her eyes, as they will, it drives her
“nuts.”
To her left many of the still lifes
in this show stand on a ledge. To her right are a series of ancestor portraits,
drab in color, reflecting their origin in old, sepia-toned photographs. Across
from the easel are the self-portraits. Kehoe surrounds herself with identity
and history.
The still lifes and self-portraits come
from different impulses. At some recent point Kehoe began to end her painting
day by starting a self-portrait. After working several hours on a still life to
the point of feeling an “utter failure,” she allowed herself to “just fool
around.” “What,” she thought, “have I got to lose?” She relaxed into
self-portraiture, unclenched her grip, loosened control and looked into a
mirror without thinking about herself. Today Kehoe sees the self-portraits as
“not about me.” It’s the same woman, different clothes. And autobiography,
presentation of an inner self, does not seem to have been her intention. She
has sought a barely conscious vantage point, wanting to see for the sake of
seeing and perhaps catch in action, unawares, the face of the determined,
wholly absorbed painter Kehoe is.
She works quickly on the self-portraits,
free from painstaking effort — a still life commonly takes her a month or more
to complete. And she applies her paint differently. The surface is edges, and
blocks, or near-blocks of color, as if she used a palette knife. These strokes
are the work of her sable bright brushes taking advantage of their ability to
make a line. Her paint handling emphasizes the intensity of expression while
suggesting that the face for a painter can be a sort of carpenter’s problem.
You need a mirror to remind you of its planes and structure. Kehoe looks hard
and then stops looking to leave her self-portrait unfinished. Her mornings
begin with final touches. Perhaps she needs to start her day confident of
having finished a painting, or she simply needs to warm up. That done Kehoe,
bends to her current set-up.
The Kehoe who paints a still life is
another painter. After her ancestor series she felt exhilarated to be “making
painted images from subjects that exist in space and light in the present
moment.” And then the exhilaration subsided as she found painting to be “very
difficult” and doubt, which has always been a part of her process, slowed her
and, perversely, spurred her on. So, she went to work in an attempt, as she has
said, “to sneak a little nuance into something boldly stated.”
In her still-life paintings, the subject
is what paint can do to make images happen, bring them alive to our
imaginations. Flowers, the lilies and ranunculus in a water glass, are the
subject in so far as they are forms, but Kehoe is not, as the variety of her
set-ups show, a painter of flowers. On her lively blog—all interested in her
work and what her eyes are on at present, plus other oddments and pleasures,
ought to go there forthwith —Kehoe quotes Degas, one of her touchstone
painters: “Painting is the ability to surround Venetian red so that it looks
like vermillion.” Kehoe’s interest in color is an engine that drives her
still-life painting; it is not her subject.
To my eye what Kehoe is after is “a
little nuance.” What do I mean? In James Schuyler’s poem “February” Schuyler is
attempting to define the moment he’s writing about. “It’s the yellow dust
inside the tulips. / “It’s the shape of a tulip. / It’s the water in the
drinking glass the tulips are in.” The moment is in all these things, but
exactly in none of them. The “It’s” sums up the nuance that we can find words
for but not the word, since the moment
is all that is in the moment. We try to pinpoint that moment only to fail with
each try, but succeed as Schuyler’s poem does or a Kehoe still life can. The
nuance in her paintings is the shape of the family-heirloom compote; folds in
cloth gathered at its base; the facets of a toy cat; “Estelle’s Mums,” specific
in each petal point; a handful of grapes in a painting no bigger than a
handful, and the pointing finger on a stick, which is a pictorial “It’s.”
Things that under Kehoe’s hand become, in her phrase, “true to their own
temperament.”
Color is nuance and so is light, and so too is
the way the paint is applied, and so is size, small in Kehoe’s art, but size is
not the same as scale. These paintings are as big as they have to be, which is
to say that into them Kehoe has put everything she knows about painting. When
the paintings click they fit perfectly in the viewers mind.
This essay will end, as Kehoe’s painting
day does, with a look at Doctor K, as in “Doctor K’s New Hat” and a glance at
the lab coat she wears when she teaches and in her studio. In most of her
self-portraits Kehoe appears bareheaded. Her hair is short, utilitarian in cut.
You can’t guess much about her style—her earrings are white dots and the frames
of her eyeglasses unstylish—from her self-portraits, but “Doctor K…” is more
forthcoming. She wears a porkpie hat and her lab coat’s collar is up at a
rakish angle. Here I am, this portrait declares, ready for another day at the
easel struggling with the objects I’ve arranged, ready to go wherever they, my
brush and palette of colors, will take me.
— William Corbett